2 questions

Re: 2 questions

Postby 23Zone » Thu Feb 21, 2019 6:52 pm

I use 1-10 too... now its even.
23Zone
Junior Member
 
Posts: 80
Joined: Fri Dec 21, 2007 4:46 pm

Re: 2 questions

Postby Magic Bird » Thu Feb 21, 2019 7:13 pm

23Zone, Wayne23, what do you like about the 1-10 system (or not like about the 1-100 scale)?
User avatar
Magic Bird
Junior Member
 
Posts: 121
Joined: Thu Jan 12, 2017 2:31 am

Re: 2 questions

Postby Wayne23 » Thu Feb 21, 2019 11:57 pm

I haven't used 1-100 in years. I guess I just think 1-10 is simpler. Having said that, you have me rethinking it. Maybe I'll give 1-100 another shot. I mean there's obviously a hell of a difference between 61 and 69, for example.
Wayne23
DDS:CB Support Squad
 
Posts: 14338
Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2007 5:23 pm

Re: 2 questions

Postby Magic Bird » Fri Feb 22, 2019 2:10 am

Wayne23 wrote:I haven't used 1-100 in years. I guess I just think 1-10 is simpler. Having said that, you have me rethinking it. Maybe I'll give 1-100 another shot. I mean there's obviously a hell of a difference between 61 and 69, for example.

In the past when I used the 1-10 scale, I grew tired of situations like having two PGs with equal ratings but one would average 5-6 assists per game in a starting role while the other would only average 3-4 apg as the starter. When I exported the database to look at their actual ratings, I found that the difference between their passing ratings was significant even though they had the same rating under the 1-10 system. I encountered similar situations with posts and their rebounding ratings. If I remember correctly, sometimes the difference in actual rating values exceeded double digits.
User avatar
Magic Bird
Junior Member
 
Posts: 121
Joined: Thu Jan 12, 2017 2:31 am

Previous

Return to DDS: College Basketball 2019 General Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests