Page 1 of 1

Maximum players ratings per position breakdown

PostPosted: Thu Oct 24, 2019 10:42 pm
by Invisible Witness
I'd like to update players ratings but I'm not sure what's the maximum value(for each attribute) for players per position they are playing. For example I've seen roster here where CB would have 99 for tackling. Is that accurate or the max value should be around 70 (for CB in tackling) ? What about other positions? Is there some reference I could use? What about Madden ratings? Would that be ok to copy ratings from there or it wouldn't work with your formula?

Re: Maximum players ratings per position breakdown

PostPosted: Fri Oct 25, 2019 12:17 am
by AKH
max is 100 for all ratings regardless of position.

Of course a cb with 100 strength would be a little silly, but people are free to balance their game as they desire.

Re: Maximum players ratings per position breakdown

PostPosted: Sat Oct 26, 2019 8:56 am
by regenerator
is this what yr looking for?

x` STR STR STR AG AG ARM ARM ACC ACC SP IN HN RBL PBL TK EN OVR
Avg Max-Min Rounded Avg Max-Min Avg Max-Min Avg Max-Min Avg Max-Min Avg Max-Min Avg Max-Min Avg Max-Min Avg Max-Min Avg MX-Mn Avg Max-Min Avg Max-Min
QB 45.6 67-27 70-25 76-40 80-40 99-53 100-50 95-57 100-50 81-45 85-40 96-46 100-50 23-1 30-1 7.7 7.0 17.8 100-50 100-50 70.1 98-39
RB 67.9 100-20 77.4 100-46 16.0 49-1 14.8 46-1 77.8 100-43 49.2 72-20 55.8 91-26 26.6 61-1 26.6 59-1 27.6 73.7 100-38 65.3 90-35
FB 72.9 97-39 55.2 86-24 6.9 23-1 6.2 23-1 70.2 89-41 46.6 75-20 56.4 83-17 47.4 79-16 40.9 67-3 26.4 56-1 72.9 100-40 71.5 100-42
TE 59.3 96-25 62.5 95-35 5.8 6.6 57.1 79-34 54.9 77-24 72.0 100-45 44.2 77-11 41.3 74-9 36.0 69-5 71.5 100-42 78.1 100-39
WR 45.6 86-14 76.0 100-37 5.7 28-1 5.2 22-1 73.6 94-46 53.6 77-27 78.6 100-47 20.5 55-1 15.9 52-1 26.2 64-1 76.2 100-43 71.4 100-34
G 79.2 100-50 42.6 76-12 6.5 5.9 43.5 67-18 59.1 84-29 7.9 30-1 72.3 100-40 63.9 96-29 35.0 66-1 60.6 98-27 71.6 100-39
T 80.1 100-44 45.0 76-10 6.1 5.4 45.3 70-17 57.9 84-32 8.6 37-1 72.8 100-41 64.2 94-33 35.0 74-6 61.8 94-24 72.7 100-38
C 79.3 100-38 42.5 76-14 6.3 5.4 43.3 68-16 58.8 85-33 8.8 32-1 75.0 100-43 66.8 100-32 34.6 65-5 60.6 92-25 74.6 100-35

Re: Maximum players ratings per position breakdown

PostPosted: Sat Oct 26, 2019 10:43 am
by Invisible Witness
regenerator wrote:is this what yr looking for?

x` STR STR STR AG AG ARM ARM ACC ACC SP IN HN RBL PBL TK EN OVR
Avg Max-Min Rounded Avg Max-Min Avg Max-Min Avg Max-Min Avg Max-Min Avg Max-Min Avg Max-Min Avg Max-Min Avg Max-Min Avg MX-Mn Avg Max-Min Avg Max-Min
QB 45.6 67-27 70-25 76-40 80-40 99-53 100-50 95-57 100-50 81-45 85-40 96-46 100-50 23-1 30-1 7.7 7.0 17.8 100-50 100-50 70.1 98-39
RB 67.9 100-20 77.4 100-46 16.0 49-1 14.8 46-1 77.8 100-43 49.2 72-20 55.8 91-26 26.6 61-1 26.6 59-1 27.6 73.7 100-38 65.3 90-35
FB 72.9 97-39 55.2 86-24 6.9 23-1 6.2 23-1 70.2 89-41 46.6 75-20 56.4 83-17 47.4 79-16 40.9 67-3 26.4 56-1 72.9 100-40 71.5 100-42
TE 59.3 96-25 62.5 95-35 5.8 6.6 57.1 79-34 54.9 77-24 72.0 100-45 44.2 77-11 41.3 74-9 36.0 69-5 71.5 100-42 78.1 100-39
WR 45.6 86-14 76.0 100-37 5.7 28-1 5.2 22-1 73.6 94-46 53.6 77-27 78.6 100-47 20.5 55-1 15.9 52-1 26.2 64-1 76.2 100-43 71.4 100-34
G 79.2 100-50 42.6 76-12 6.5 5.9 43.5 67-18 59.1 84-29 7.9 30-1 72.3 100-40 63.9 96-29 35.0 66-1 60.6 98-27 71.6 100-39
T 80.1 100-44 45.0 76-10 6.1 5.4 45.3 70-17 57.9 84-32 8.6 37-1 72.8 100-41 64.2 94-33 35.0 74-6 61.8 94-24 72.7 100-38
C 79.3 100-38 42.5 76-14 6.3 5.4 43.3 68-16 58.8 85-33 8.8 32-1 75.0 100-43 66.8 100-32 34.6 65-5 60.6 92-25 74.6 100-35

Wow! What is this hideous thing :) All I can see it's the numbers and some more numbers...but it looks like something I was looking for ! Let me just double check with you if I'm reading this correctly. For example TE and his Strength rating: Max value for an elite TE should be 96? What about RB in OVR rating ? I'm reading 90 is Max. Is that correct? What about ratings for CBs and FS I don't see any.

Re: Maximum players ratings per position breakdown

PostPosted: Mon Nov 04, 2019 2:40 am
by regenerator
Sry I know its ugly let me see if i can provide something formatted a little better - but it sounds like u have the general idea. Maybe Ill just PM u the xls file