On the other hand I didn't like Bracket Busters at all...

A HUGE flaw in Promo/Rel. Independents have only a 15 game schedule. This could easily be resolved by having all Independents play each other twice, home and home.

Its not really a flaw...it's the way Gary set it up as a test for the extra 5 teams. When playing promotion/relegation, in my mind I look at those 5 teams as not true Division 1 teams...they play 15 games against Division 1 opponents (before conference play begins) as a way fo determine which one will move up to replace the worst Division 1 team in Conference V which is relegated. I think of them as the 5 most likely Division 2 schools to be considered to move up to Division 1 and after they play their 15 games against Division 1 opponents, their "conference season" is within Division 2 which has no bearing on the Promo/relegation association.

Meh. The team I'm coaching, Central Connecticut, has been Division I for at least a couple of decades, and has even been to the NCAA tournament a couple of times.
Oh, it's 16 games; I screwed up on that.
I STILL think they should play home and home against each other.

Win enough games and you'll be back up in Conf V next season!

Well, there's that...

CPU Notre Dame team started(played 30 minutes) a 4 star C against me at PG, good news, he had 7 assist, bad news, he had 19 TOs. My staff's perception of his ratings are 3 for passing and 1 for handle. There are two 2 star actual Point Guards on the team who both have 5 passing and 4 handle ratings. The Center is averaging 11.9 TOs a game on the season.

Hopefully some tuning can occur that won't have this , or the 6' 2" Point Guard that started against me at Center in another game, happen

I've never seen anything like that occur in my associations...rather than adding this to the suggestion list, I suggest you forward your association files to Gary via a Support Ticket. Be sure to indicate the specific games/teams where this occurred so he can check it out. Also advise him of the specific mod you're using and/or any data base changes or player edits if you've made them to your association.

I've never seen anything like this either.

Revise the pro draft results - making them based on actual player performance rather than whatever it's currently based on. In many drafts players who were completely unimpressive in college get picked before those who excelled. In just my last draft, the #7 pick never even played a minute in college then declared after his freshman year.