2 questions

[kicktothehead99]

1. can you change the ratings style after starting a career? I am using 1-10 but curious how 1-100 would be
2 how do you view a pbp log after the game? I have yet to find them.

[Gary Gorski]

1. No you can't change it because the game already calculated the ratings for who you already have scouted or seen in the game

2. There is not a pbp log but its on the list of things to do in another version

[Your_Imaginary_Friend]

I'm using 1-100 because I enjoy player development more than any other aspect of sports sims. It is much easier to see improvement (or not) with 1-100. The 1-10 scale doesn't change all that much and left me head scratching too much of the time.

[CoachC]

I'm using 1-100 because I enjoy player development more than any other aspect of sports sims. It is much easier to see improvement (or not) with 1-100. The 1-10 scale doesn't change all that much and left me head scratching too much of the time.

I agree , i have always used 1-100 in cb, because player development can be slow at times and the 1-10 scale doesn't really reflect what is actually going on.

[CoachC]

I should say player development is slow ALL the time and a 1-10 scale NEVER really tells you what is going on!

[Magic Bird]

1. No you can't change it because the game already calculated the ratings for who you already have scouted or seen in the game

Could the ability to switch between the 1-10 and 1-100 scales be added in future versions anyway? The game recalculates ratings periodically, and I personally would not mind waiting a few in-game months for the changes to take effect.

Also, right now the game's default setting when creating a new association is to use the 1-10 scale. Perhaps the default setting should be the 1-100 scale instead. Like CoachC and Your_Imaginary_Friend, I prefer to use the 1-100 scale as well. A default selection of the 1-100 scale may reflect the preference of the majority of DDS:CB's players.

2. There is not a pbp log but its on the list of things to do in another version

This will be a great addition!

[PointGuard]

While I prefer SOME info about players (therefore not liking "limited ratings"), I prefer the greater ambiguity "1-10 ratings" provides as compared to "1-100 ratings". But it's good the game provides options since game players differ so much.

While I have no idea how many use each ratings option, the majority of players may well not be using 1-100. Making the ratings option changeable during the course of an association''s run would be a nice thing if it's easy to do, but I think there are many other changes/improvements that are more worthwhile Gary spending any considerable time and effort on.

[Magic Bird]

While I prefer SOME info about players (therefore not liking "limited ratings"), I prefer the greater ambiguity "1-10 ratings" provides as compared to "1-100 ratings".

While I have no idea how many use each ratings option, the majority of players may well not be using 1-100.

From this thread alone there appears to be a 3-1 majority in favor of the 1-100 ratings system, but if we include everyone who plays the game, the truth may be that there is, say, a 361-548 majority in favor of the 1-10 scale. (I have no clue how many people play DDS:CB)

But it's good the game provides options since game players differ so much.

Making the ratings option changeable during the course of an association''s run would be a nice thing if it's easy to do, but I think there are many other changes/improvements that are more worthwhile Gary spending any considerable time and effort on.

I agree wholeheartedly!

[PointGuard]

Yes, the majority of game owners never post here so who knows how many use which rating system.

[Wayne23]

I use 1-10.